I’ve had a few rounds of feedback on Vengeance Will Come and have been mostly diligent in filing responses in a sub folder of the project as soon as I receive it. (If your inbox is anything like mine, things get lost in there like a grain of dirt swept up in a mudslide).
Sadly, that’s about where the organisation of feedback ended. (In my partial defence, I intentionally wasn’t processing the feedback straight away: I wanted a balance of opinions and some time to pass).
Here is what I’m going to do now, and in the future, before starting the revision process.
Compiling the Feedback
Create a Feedback Compilation document, which has the same structure (chapters and scenes etc) as the novel.
Go through each (feedback) document/email:
- Where it’s a typo, grammar or obvious error (e.g. wrong character name), fix it in the manuscript immediately.
- Where the feedback is incontestably wrong, ignore it. (If there is any doubt, don’t ignore it).
- Where the feedback relates to a given chapter/scene place it in that location in the document. If it’s thematic feedback or has broader application than a single section I’ll add it to the top of the document.
I’ll add three-letter initials of the reviewer in brackets at the end of the comment, just in case I want to know who provided it. Some reviewers opinions should hold more weight than others and it’s always helpful to be able to later clarify comments.
- If the tone of the comment is positive, change the font colour to something less stand-out than black. I’m leaving it in the document so I don’t accidentally “edit out” the bits people like. And, inevitably, there’ll be days when I need a motivational boost.
- Where I disagree with the feedback I’ll add a comment in brackets as to why, and colour the font a grey. (It’s still there, but less important).
- Where I agree with the comment (or enough reviewers pick up on the same issue) and it’s a major problem, apply bold and red font.
- Once I’ve added all the feedback from all reviews, I’ll group my related dot points (to see the weight of opinions). This might result in grey text I disagree with becoming black text. I might also paraphrase a collection of dot points down into a concise problem statement.
- If reviewers disagree with each other then I’ll either side with one, or put both opinions in a table with two columns (pros and cons).
After all this work I should have a single document to use as a reference when editing each section of the novel.
If you write, what are your strategies for managing feedback?